[OpenAFS] AES Support ?

Derrick Brashear shadow@gmail.com
Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:24:01 -0400


------=_Part_1665_25568824.1190917441653
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 9/27/07, John Hascall <john@iastate.edu> wrote:
>
>
> > > > We aren't going to break existing deployments of AFS.
>
> > >    So all future releases of OpenAFS forever will support rxkad
> > >    and K4/DES-based tokens?  And there will be no way for a cell
> > >    to turn that off?  Really?
>
> > You have the source. You can always patch it. So that's obviously false.
>
>   Well, that's a tautology isn't it.   You can always say "we aren't going
>   to break it, you can always patch it yourself".


We aren't going to break it is not you aren't going to break it.

I can't stop you from shooting yourself in the foot, but I'm not interested
in helping. I've made that point in those words before.

You have a point, but I don't think it's the point you've been presenting.

> But there's literally no one with AFS deployed now whose clients are ready
> > for this transition.
>
>   Today isn't the point.  Presumably, someday people *will* start to
>   transition.  And, barring a worldwide flag-day, cells *will* make
>   the transition at different times.  Somebody *will* be the first
>   one to delete their "afs" principal.


Yup. And then old clients get unauth access only.

  Previously in this discussion it was said you need to upgrade all
>   your servers before you start upgrading your clients.  So if, (on
>   that day that some other cell deletes "afs"), you haven't progressed
>   far enough in your transition to where you can upgrade your clients,
>   it sounds to me like you are in trouble.


Only if you want authenticated access.

------=_Part_1665_25568824.1190917441653
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/27/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">John Hascall</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:john@iastate.edu">john@iastate.edu</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>&gt; &gt; &gt; We aren&#39;t going to break existing deployments of AFS.<br><br>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;So all future releases of OpenAFS forever will support rxkad<br>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;and K4/DES-based tokens?&nbsp;&nbsp;And there will be no way for a cell
<br>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;to turn that off?&nbsp;&nbsp;Really?<br><br>&gt; You have the source. You can always patch it. So that&#39;s obviously false.<br><br>&nbsp;&nbsp;Well, that&#39;s a tautology isn&#39;t it.&nbsp;&nbsp; You can always say &quot;we aren&#39;t going
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;to break it, you can always patch it yourself&quot;.</blockquote><div><br>We aren&#39;t going to break it is not you aren&#39;t going to break it. <br><br>I can&#39;t stop you from shooting yourself in the foot, but I&#39;m not interested in helping. I&#39;ve made that point in those words before. 
<br><br>You have a point, but I don&#39;t think it&#39;s the point you&#39;ve been presenting.<br> </div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
&gt; But there&#39;s literally no one with AFS deployed now whose clients are ready<br>&gt; for this transition.<br><br>&nbsp;&nbsp;Today isn&#39;t the point.&nbsp;&nbsp;Presumably, someday people *will* start to<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;transition.&nbsp;&nbsp;And, barring a worldwide flag-day, cells *will* make
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;the transition at different times.&nbsp;&nbsp;Somebody *will* be the first<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;one to delete their &quot;afs&quot; principal.</blockquote><div><br>Yup. And then old clients get unauth access only.<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
&nbsp;&nbsp;Previously in this discussion it was said you need to upgrade all<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;your servers before you start upgrading your clients.&nbsp;&nbsp;So if, (on<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;that day that some other cell deletes &quot;afs&quot;), you haven&#39;t progressed
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;far enough in your transition to where you can upgrade your clients,<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;it sounds to me like you are in trouble.</blockquote><div><br>Only if you want authenticated access. <br></div><br></div><br>

------=_Part_1665_25568824.1190917441653--